how to drop shit

Helven · Post by **Helven** » Thu Feb 05, 2004 11:32 pm

Hmmm, I didn’t meet presumptuous people here.
You know, lad, I wonder how much shit you have to drop on everybody… Your store is inexhaustible, yeah

? But do you have anything but shit

? That’s the most interesting question! Maybe some “flowers in the dirt”? I mean, brilliants in the shit?

Zabka · Post by **Zabka** » Fri Feb 06, 2004 12:23 am

I second that Lizzy!

Tchocolatl

my comment wasn't about French Canadians (boy would my boyfriend be p'd off about that) it was about Canadian French, and all I really meant was that it's not what they teach in school

- understanding any languages idioms is hard enough. I (generally) love any kind of Canadian. Mmmm...except rudies (lol Liz)

Still -250 is a lot more than most people have, and I'm happy with that.

Well, enjoy yourselves and be kind to one another...I'm off to a BIG party

PS I think SepticCon r e a l l y likes a thousand kisses deep

Tchocolatl · Post by **Tchocolatl** » Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:10 am

OK.

After Agatha Christie, now Ionesco.

C. · Post by C. » Fri Feb 06, 2004 3:46 am

Je comprend le francais mais c'eat quoi un "frise-merde"? Je connait pas l'expression..

C.

September_Cohen · Post by **September_Cohen** » Fri Feb 06, 2004 8:35 pm

Liz...really don't mind about the facts "that crawls dead all around you".
Really don't give a shit to your "I think I'm a moderator" attitude.
I'm surely most catholic than you...so don't talk to me about the Inside of Leonard Cohen. It is his. Not yours. When Cohen send something on this site, it is not because you're so great people. "I'm not convinced"!
You don't got the right to judge about what i'm writing. Everyone except you...at the limit.

p.s. "Hey gang...put a stupid emoticons on your post and tell me what I CAN LEARN FROM A DOG.

September_Cohen · Post by **September_Cohen** » Fri Feb 06, 2004 8:37 pm

p.p.s. Un frise-merde...c'est une personne prétentieuse qui se cache sous un beau california smile. Même pas foutu de chier comme il le faut...elle frise sa merde.

margaret · Post by **margaret** » Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:40 pm

So, not very complimentary then! I think we all guessed that anyway. But who cares?

Heretic · Post by **Heretic** » Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

I'm not going to engage with you regarding your postings.

Your 7 posts thus far Tysh Darling really give weight to that statement.

However, I am going to tell you that your increasingly sub-standard and derogatory terminology is inappropriate for this site.

Like fuck it is. Goddam speach Nazis invading the board again.

lizzytysh · Post by **lizzytysh** » Sat Feb 07, 2004 1:41 am

Heretic ~

Counting the postings prior to the statement is of no relevance. Highly-derogatory name-calling [even though I'm not even sure who they were directed to] is inappropriate for this site.

Speech is spelled with two e's.

~ Lizzytysh

Coco · Post by **Coco** » Sat Feb 07, 2004 2:19 am

Hi Lizzytysh,

Your remarks to SeptemberCohen on this thread are right on target. And I'm with you on the right to choose emoticons.

I think they brighten up posts. Just as I would never impose emoticons on anyone else, so on the other hand, no one has the right to limit the use of emoticons by others.

And your post to Hairy Tick? Nice shot!

Coco · Post by **Coco** » Sat Feb 07, 2004 2:22 am

Hi Hairy Tick,

You claim not to be Partisan, don't you?

Then why are you calling Lizzytysh; "Tysh Darling". Wasn't that an endearment that Partisan was so fond of using?

George.Wright · Post by **George.Wright** » Sat Feb 07, 2004 3:29 am

Partisan and heretic are confused with the past, they are both obsessive, sorry i mean possessed. Heretic's posts are becoming second rate and stale, it must be the stay in the Circle Six with Partisan. He is losing his humour and his wit with his compulsive desire to drive Liz from the Board.
He is getting nowhere and his frustration is dulling his once admired but becoming more acid comments.
Georges

Anne · Post by **Anne** » Sat Feb 07, 2004 4:21 am

I think Jarkko is the only person who can decide what is

lizzytysh wrote: inappropriate for this site

The way I see it is. if you don't like what someone is saying, fine, tell them so, but don't insist that they have no right to say it.

lizzytysh · Post by **lizzytysh** » Sat Feb 07, 2004 4:30 am

There is a major difference between being able to tell someone they are doing something inappropriate; and being able to act and force someone to stop doing something inappropriate. The distinction is power.

My views aren't contingent upon Jarkko's. Mine are what I express, and conclusively, in cases such as this. If you have no particular views on it, you're welcome to remain silent.

September_Cohen · Post by **September_Cohen** » Sat Feb 07, 2004 12:16 pm

-----

Photo removed by the administrator

----