My comments on Dear Heather

Leonard Cohen's recent albums - share your views with others!
Post Reply
September_Cohen
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 8:37 pm
Location: Quebec city, Canada

My comments on Dear Heather

Post by September_Cohen »

Ok, first of all, this is an album you must listen to all alone, even without yourself. After my first listening session, it comes to me that it was a kind of good Tacoma trailer album. With a truly comfortying booklet, of course. If at the beginning, Go no more a-roving sounds like a modified Be for real, There for you like A 1000 kisses deep (in a not-that-much-deeper-way), The letters and The Faith like outtakes from TNS and Recent songs, (respectively), I think it is well expiated all along the way.
I got a great laugh for Dear Heather which is everything but a song of tenderness (Yeah! It is Grumbacher).

But the only and big problem that occured to me for this album and the next one (I hope not) got the name SHARON ROBINSON. Does Leonard, at 70, need a babysitter? Where the real and franker voice of Leonard appears is in the song she is not in : the so-splendid-and-too-sadly-short Nightingale. Even with Leonard's guitar!!! Will she let him someday do an album by his own? That was ok for Everybody knows, waiting for the miracle and even with TNS, but I think this collaboration is becoming to be foul. We want to hear women in background!!! Not to hear Leonard as a simple sensual low sigh. He still got the golden voice. I want more Nightingale and less Robinson. I hope it is not only my own wish. For the rest, it is a good album to listen to. Thanks for The faith Leonard, a song from our common homeland. Keep it in the heart.
One for the money
Two for the show
Three to get ready
Go man go
I said tell me Mr. Siegal
How do I get out of here
User avatar
tomsakic
Posts: 5274
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

Post by tomsakic »

But September_Cohen, Sharon Robinson sang and produced only three songs, and of that three, The Letters is duet (what's OK with me), and on There For You she really sings only back ups (and she's credited for back ups in booklet, for other two it says "vocals LC and SR"). So I cannot actually see what's wrong with her, she really droped out this time. Also, Sharon had nothing with Nightingale.
Anjani sang 9 songs! And I have problem with that, although her voice is gorgeous, I want hear LEONARD singing the beautiful Undertow, and also, I want to hear LEONARD singing the whole Faith!

The good information is that the real name for this album was OLD IDEAS, but he changed it because somebody could think it's new compilation :? I think that title was more appropriate:)

Speaking about next record, I believe that these three TNS-like Sharon-produced songs were left after TNS sessions, and that LC started working with Anjani after that (expect for Villanelle). I also think - and that makes me sad - that there will be no Sharon on next album.

By the way, Croatian radio is airing The Letters, and reviewers claim that song like "Cohen classic", "spooky beautiful", "the best on this record". One here said about Dear Heather that it reminds on Dylan's Rainy Day Women in deadly slow "robotic love" masterpiece performed by Air!
User avatar
linmag
Posts: 892
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:10 pm
Location: Gloucester, UK
Contact:

Post by linmag »

Old Ideas would have been an excellent title for this album. It works on several levels. What a shame Leonard got talked out of it (presumably by the marketing department, most of whom freak out at the thought of trying to sell anything old).
Linda

1972: Leeds, 2008: Manchester, Lyon, London O2, 2009: Wet Weybridge, 2012: Hop Farm/Wembley Arena
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 25531
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Post by lizzytysh »

Olde Ideas would have been fine, too. However, Dear Heather it is....and a rose by any other name is still a rose. So is heather.
Post Reply

Return to “Live in London, Dear Heather, The Essential Leonard Cohen, Ten New Songs”