Cyberspace carries no guarantees of identity, purpose, or motive ~ no matter how well you think you know that you know that you know. I go with my instincts, which generally have proven to be good.
Of course, with regard to Heathcliffe, it probably helps that I have two, distinct, real-life 'models' who were idealistic, vulnerable, and open in the area of love. One of them was gay, and the other was straight. They both felt truly and spoke their hearts. For you, it would all be imaginary. For me, I choose to see it as real, and I prefer to err on the side of kindness. I see him as a young man, sitting alone at his computer, feeling very lonely and sad. In today's world [with decreasing 'connectedness' between people], that is unfortunately not such an uncommon vision or likelihood.
As you revert to your recent [new] stance relating to 'smart cookie,' your original words related to a young man, telling him
Dear Heathcliff~
Quit whining and grow some whiskers.
It is my best advice.
Everything else, time will heal. No, scratch that. Time will suppress. Yeah, that's the ticket.
regards,
Laurie
and later stating,
"My response was quite serious.
If you want to feed baby food to a 23 year old guy, fine. I don't particularly think that it will do much more than illicit more of the same."
These words have
absolutely nothing to do with thinking someone is on a wind-up. These words have
everything to do with referring to someone who is real, but who you believe is spilling his heart and wallowing in "whining" self-pity; and your belief that he is being mollycoddled, and that mollycoddling will do no good ~ and that your, own best advice [already given, to quit whining and grow some whiskers] is the best, possibly
only way to handle someone his age; and, to do otherwise, will only encourage him to continue in his wallowing in "whining" self-pity.
So, while you're being amused, I'm being amazed that you actually think people are going to believe your ruse, regarding what you originally meant with the two things you said. Someone just happened to come along and named you in connection with a theory, which revealed a door labeled "Out" and you jumped at it, so you could 'ascend,' with condescension toward those who had offered sincere comment. There was an earlier opportunity where you could have chimed in, had you really meant that in the beginning.
Now, you've taken it to the extent of my communicating with an imaginary friend. You certainly have a need of some sort

; I'm guessing to try to bolster and support your deception. The more you reference it, perhaps, the more believable it will become. There's a practiced theory on that, too......if you repeat a lie long enough, people will begin to see it as true [including, sometimes, yourself]. Politicians make ready, handy use of it, frequently, in their campaigns. Someone may be convinced, but I'm surely not.
~ Lizzy