FilmCritic.com review of "I'm Your Man"

News about Leonard Cohen and his work, press, radio & TV programs etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
tomsakic
Posts: 5274
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

FilmCritic.com review of "I'm Your Man"

Post by tomsakic »

http://filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf etc /long url/
-------------------------------------------------------------
RATING (out of 5)
ImageImage

Director: Lian Lunson
Producer: Mel Gibson, Lian Lunson, Bruce Davey
Screenwriter:
Stars: Bono, Nick Cave, Julie Christensen, Adam Clayton, Jarvis Cocker, Leonard Cohen, Antony Hegarty, Anna McGarrigle, Kate McGarrigle, Larry Mullen Jr., Beth Orton, The Edge, Teddy Thompson, Martha Wainwright, Rufus Wainwright, Hal Willner
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Year of Release: 2006
Released on Video: Not Yet Available

Leonard Cohen: I'm Your Man
A film review by Jay Antani - Copyright © 2006 filmcritic.com


Here's a prime example of what happens when fascinating subject matter falls prey to inept filmmaking. Lian Lunson's Leonard Cohen: I'm Your Man is a frustrating mess, redeemed intermittently by a few solid musical performances and by the towering, erudite presence of Cohen himself.

Much of Lunson's tribute to the legendary songsmith is taken up by a 2005 concert featuring a lineup of international folk and pop artists honoring Cohen's music. I don't claim a close familiarity with Cohen's music, but it doesn't take an aficionado of it to figure out that several of the performances are overwrought, shrill, or just plain boring. Rufus Wainwright's nasally crooning and vamping reduce the wry humor of "Everybody Knows" and "Chelsea Hotel #2" into fey cabaret numbers. Elsewhere, Nick Cave's version of "I'm Your Man" by way of a Vegas lounge act deadens the senses, and Jarvis Cocker's stiffly delivered "Death Of a Ladies' Man" is god-awful. Aside from the default pleasure taken in knowing that you're hearing one of Cohen's songs, this is disposable material. All of it, that is, with the exception of Teddy Thompson's version of "Tonight Will Be Fine," Antony Hegarty's "If It Be Your Will," and Martha Wainwright's "The Traitor": Three performances that achieve the grace and soulful resonance of Cohen's music, so devoid in the rest of Lunson's documentary.

Cohen's lyrics have a stealthy, haunting eloquence carried along by the storm clouds of his signature, brooding voice. But concert producer, Hal Willner, bleeds all the darkness and enigma out of Cohen's work and buffs it up with a backing orchestra and an overproduced slickness worthy of a VH1 special. Lunson's filming of the concert too is rife with irony because the documentary-maker, according to the press notes, wanted to avoid making a "Leonard Cohen: Behind the Music." Yet this is precisely the effect of watching her conventionally shot, softly lit concert footage.

Lunson intersperses the concert numbers with testimonials from its performers, each reflecting on what Cohen's music has meant to him or her. And sticking out like superstar-sore thumbs from this repertoire of indie acts are Bono and The Edge, spilling one platitude after another about the religiosity and sensuality in Cohen's lyrics, etc. If it weren't for Lunson's interviews with Cohen himself, in which he expounds on the themes in his music, the milestones in his career, and his roots in the Beat-era Montreal poetry scene, this film might've been dismissed as a monotonous panegyric.

True, Cohen's work deserves great praise, but Lunson ignores, forgets, or is artistically incapable of understanding that, even in a tribute movie, a critical perspective is needed by which we, as viewers, can gain a personal vantage on the subject. At a loss for incisive content, she resorts to sweetening her footage with jejune optical and sound effects: Overlays of flickering red circles, unnerving echoes and hisses, digitally sped up/slowed down images, images and sounds in reverse, all of which are meant to convey a dreamlike effect, but instead feel tiresome and amateurish. Indeed, if I didn't know any better, I'm Your Man would seem like the product of an undergraduate film student who had access to way too many bells and whistles, but no personal voice.

Never in I'm Your Man does a rounded representation of Cohen, the life-weary artist and spiritual seeker, come into relief. We get some interesting autobiographical reflections from Cohen himself and a moment wherein he reads aloud from a preface to one of his novels that's a pure pleasure to experience. But these stand outside Lunson's filmmaking, which sorely lacks a point of view, a sense of searching beneath what are merely facts and rosy impressions to become an intelligent inquiry into Cohen's creative spirit.
Image
Can I be the man?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 25531
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Post by lizzytysh »

Thanks for posting this, Tom.

He certainly made his points clear, didn't he!?! His final line is quite cute :wink: . These various reviews ~ raves, pans, and mixed ~ really make me wonder how my opionion is going to square with them.

The sense that I get is that I'm going to agree with some of these negative assessments. There's nothing like pure Cohen... and attempts to gussy him up can only fall short of him and his work.

These varied reviews are causing me to sincerely wish that he would get with whoever it was who apparently wanted to make a real, old-fashioned documentary on him. That's something that Leonard, without question, deserves.


~ Lizzy
Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:52 am
Location: Illinois, USA. Planet Earth.

Post by Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan »

Lizz,
You are exactly right about that. I would like to see a really in depth and long documentary about his life and work and everything. I have a feeling, however, that we won't see that until after he's dead. Then some mainstream people will become more aware of him and see the greatness of it all.

"unnerving echoes and hisses..." for some reason this made me laugh out loud. The way he wrote it. Maybe it's just the mood I'm in but that was funny as hell.

I too think that it sounds like the DVD will be more surface than I'd like. But anything Cohen is good to see.
I thought it was a pretty well written review though, if I'll ultimately agree with it or not I don't know.

At least he didn't say anything bad about Leonard and his work, thus we won't have to go kick his ass.

Kevin©
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 25531
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Post by lizzytysh »

. . . thus we won't have to go kick his ass.
:lol: Thank heaven :lol: .

Yes ~ And a NON-mainstream documentary would be much preferred.

~ Lizzy
Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:52 am
Location: Illinois, USA. Planet Earth.

Post by Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan »

Yeah. I would like to see a really in depth one by someone who has a pretty good knowledge of his work and doesn't think he needs younger artists around him like ornaments to attract "the kids." I think that's kind of insulting to be honest about it. Not to sound like too much of an elitist but if you aren't a philosophically inclined person Cohen's stuff probably won't do anything for you. And if you are, it doesn't matter what age you are you will be drawn to the original work. As I said before, I was fairly young when I became a fan...and it wasn't after hearing someone else's version.

The mainstrestreaming of anything usually sucks the life out of it. Unless it's outright prostitution or drug legalization. I think those two things would be the same but I'm not one to know.:)

For all of my Cohen purists out there,

Kevin©
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 25531
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Post by lizzytysh »

Hi Kevin ~

I agree with what you're saying, for the most part. However, there are philosophically inclined and philosophically deep young people out there, who simply haven't discovered Leonard's work. A number of people here came to it by way of "Pump Up the Volume" ~ not exactly Dante, right :wink: ? So, at this juncture, if this works, GREAT ~ and remember that Bono is a socially- and environmentally-concerned being, so it's not like some fluff bonding with and 'promoting' Leonard's work; likewise, with the other performers. I would rather young people discover Leonard's work while Leonard is still alive ~ they will, perhaps, still be able to see him perform Live or even simply wish him a Happy Birthday via this site! It's something many of us have been grateful for the opportunity to do, during the years when we never dreamed Leonard might tour, again 8) . There's always time for a deepening exploration of his work, but first you need to discover him. I hope that will be the case for many, deep thinking, young people out there.


~ Lizzy
Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:52 am
Location: Illinois, USA. Planet Earth.

Post by Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan »

You're right about that. Younger people do need a point of entry for his work. I was thinking selfishly about what I want to see. And it probably is good to find out if someone is thirsty for a teaspoon of water before you blast them in the face with a fire hose. Im pretty opposed to the idea of "tributes" anyway, but if more young people are drawn to it from U2 or whoever then it's a good start. So ultimately I agree with what you said about it drawing younger people in, I just don't think Leonard's stuff needs to be marketed that way for it to happen.

"It takes a genius to whine appealingly."-F. Scott Fitzgerald

I'm not one but Fitzgerald was and Leonard is. And for some reason that quote fit nicely here for me.

Kevin©
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 25531
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Post by lizzytysh »

And it probably is good to find out if someone is thirsty for a teaspoon of water before you blast them in the face with a fire hose.
:lol: ~ Apt use 8) !
"It takes a genius to whine appealingly."-F. Scott Fitzgerald

I'm not one but Fitzgerald was and Leonard is. And for some reason that quote fit nicely here for me.
I agree :wink: and don't always whine appealingly myself :) .

What might some other avenues be that would be likely to attract the young? I know I don't know many who watch the "Jim Lehrer News Hour" :wink: , though some [and their parents :idea: :idea: 8) !] might be more likely to watch "Shrek". That, however, would seem to be more in support of my premise.


~ Lizzy
Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:52 am
Location: Illinois, USA. Planet Earth.

Post by Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan »

You are fast. I have an obvious answer. They should be studying it in school.
But, in reality, hearing it in a movie is just as well. There aren't many sources in our currently insipid culture. You have me cornered about that. So it does all boil down to word of mouth and endorments from currently popular artists. God knows his record company isn't going to promote it too heavily and radio is definitely not going to play it much.

In a just world his work would be issued to people. And I do realize that not all young philosophical thinkers are going to be around someone who will tell them about it. To me that's one of the great things about any art. It doesn't come to you, you go to it. And in doing so you reap the rewards. Maybe I'm just thinking people might actively seek out things more than they actually do. I was willing to give them the benefit of the of the doubt.

Kevin©
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 25531
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Post by lizzytysh »

That's true, Kevin. They do seek it out and deserve that benefit of the doubt. However, at a younger age, a person isn't always able to formulate exactly how to go about doing that... so they do learn through the musicians they already admire... however, not every interview gets seen or read ~ and a film automatically gets greater coverage of the general population... well, if it's marketed well :wink: .

Many in CANADA 8) [not the U.S. :( ] are fortunate to already be studying it in school... both high school and university levels :D ! We're the ones in our immediate, northern hemisphere who have the problem with lack of exposure to Leonard's work. I would hope that in our university, poetry classes ~ at least there! ~ one would be introduced to Leonard's poetry.

Sometimes, when we're young, we don't even 'know' that we're seeking deeper, philosophical stuff, either... there's just a generalized feeling of discontent, longing, even hopelessness, that can't necessarily be identified. For some, that would point to religion. For others, art. Still others, both. The awareness of what we were missing and 'seeking' comes only after it's been found.


~ Lizzy
Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:52 am
Location: Illinois, USA. Planet Earth.

Post by Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan »

...or when you seek and find something and then realize that you were seeking something else all along.

Kevin©
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 25531
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Post by lizzytysh »

That's true, too, Kevin :lol: .

Other thoughts on this issue include that this is a bit of an 'elitest' position ~ we who have discovered Leonard and his work in various ways, each have our own special memory of 'how.' There's a sense of having 'earned' our access to him, a kind of fated 'rite of passage' that brought us to him that has often had a certain mystique and magic, a late-night listening to the radio in the dark, or a chance turning of the tv channel, and here appears his voice for the first time ever, a profound discovery. Our stories are highly-varied, individual, and precious. Not a 'simplistic' attending of a mass-marketed film about people 'we' do know, like Bono, etc., whilst eating popcorn and drinking Coke... and in the process of that afternoon or evening out, to discover Cohen on a 'mass scale' with other theater-goers, in the process. Something not quite as romantic about that.

Still, at this point in Leonard's life and career, these seem, perhaps, a luxury we/he may still be able to afford, but do we/does he want to?? Why not have Leonard enjoy the fruits of his labours, whilst he's still alive... to be appreciated as much as possible in his own lifetime, and for those who discover him, to have the opportunity to see him perform Live. He's returning to performing and publishing/producing his work to try to recoup some serious losses. All of this works toward that. He's touched many of our lives in profound ways. The more he's able to do that, the better.


~ Lizzy
Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:52 am
Location: Illinois, USA. Planet Earth.

Post by Kevin W.M.LastYearsMan »

All good points. And I think that you're right about what probably shaped my opinion in the back of my mind. It wasn't something that I'd thought about but I suppose that it does cheapen it subconsciously for me that it's a mass marketed thing and not a romantic story of how one first encounters Cohen. That hadn't entered into my conscious thinking and I'm glad you made the point. So yeah, it is an elitist point of view to think that there needs to be a right of passage, I just hand not thought of it as such.

Also, as I wrote yesterday, my thinking was influenced by the notion of what type of documentary I'd rather see.

Entirely good post.
Kevin©
User avatar
lizzytysh
Posts: 25531
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Post by lizzytysh »

Hi Kevin ~

Thanks. I remember the ambivalence of coming to the Sony and then Jarkko's site, when I first did... feeling delighted to find there are so many others who share this intimate feeling I have for Leonard's work... yet, feeling that I'd been alone in a dark room with only Leonard's voice, feelings, and ideas... and having someone suddenly fling open the door and turn on a bright and blinding light. He had been my virtually private world for so long... and I came to him and his work in a very personal and meaningful way. I understand.
Also, as I wrote yesterday, my thinking was influenced by the notion of what type of documentary I'd rather see.
For my own taste, I, too, would prefer to see the type of documentary you refer to here... no matter how good Lian's is... the point has been made in reviews and continues to be made that no one can sing Leonard like Leonard. A serious exploration of Leonard and his work, by scholars and himself, and with his own voice singing and playing his songs, is something I still hope for... I know how well you understand and share in that. Here's hoping, huh :) .


~ Lizzy :D
Post Reply

Return to “News”