It's indeed a good compilation in refreshing uptempo style. Closing time for instance is very funny and lively. BUT ... their Suzanne is a No-Go. Set into jazz you want your player to automatically skip it. Besides this ---- I have never heard a better version than the original on Leonard's first album.
Hi there,
I just thought I’d respond to the comments about Suzanne.
When Elana Stone came to a rehearsal and sat down the piano and played her interpretation of Suzanne, I was, in a word, mortified. I thought it was sacrilegious, and unnecessary, like taking something as seminal and harmonically simple as Lennon’s Imagine, and re-voicing it with jazz chords. But the more I heard it, the more I started appreciating the sheer beauty of it. A sublime marriage of jagged chords with a simple exquisite melody; not a mirror-image cover, but a staggeringly original departure from the original. Unconsciously, I started appreciating Elana’s Suzanne completely in its own right, i.e. without the coloring thoughts of the Cohen original. By not referring back to the original, I was able to enjoy it without the musically defensive instincts I initially experienced. And in the 8 months I have been acquainted with her version of Suzanne, I have come to love it heart and soul!! Yes it is massively different from the original, but I believe it succeeds emotionally and musically. I would consider it exceptionally brave, but that would imply that Elana made a conscious, contrived decision to deliberately fuck with the song, and I’m quite sure that’s not her style. She would have simply sat down at the piano and played it in a way that was instinctive and relevant and appealing to herself. And in my humble opinion, I believe that’s one of the reasons it works so well, and is now one of my favorite tracks on the CD!
All the best!
Yaron Hallis
P.s. I’m curious what the general consensus is about Nina Simone’s version of Suzanne. It rates amongst my all-time favorite Cohen covers, and is also quite a radical departure from the original.